This Time Around, Trump's Team Is 'Doing What He Says' | National Review

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

60% : Blair singles out Trump's tax-related campaign promises, such as ending taxes on tips, Social Security, and overtime pay, as "very popular" proposals voters are eager to see enacted.
42% : From tariff policy to national security, this Trump White House is letting Trump be Trump.
41% : Many Trump 1.0 White House officials came in with the moral imperative to serve as a check on Trump, believing they could steer the ship in the right direction despite their own personal misgivings about his character and policy aims.
40% : He believes this cabinet is representative of the coalition that helped elect Trump, and that confirming unconventional picks like Tulsi Gabbard and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. serves as another example of giving the American people what they voted for.
38% : Naturally Trump, who has long complained about hiring "disloyal people" during his first term, made the final call on all high-profile picks.
29% : But in the view of many longtime Trump allies, the op-ed still crystallized the problem Trump faced last time around -- constant leaks to reporters, infighting, and a desire to rein in what Taylor called the president's "misguided impulses."
29% : The second Trump White House understands the assignment, Urban says: "Donald Trump doesn't need an interpreter."
28% : That no vote unleashed a rageful social media post from Trump demanding a primary challenge against Massie, a rare breed of Republican who is completely unfazed by the president's threats despite his unrivaled control over the GOP.
27% : People close to the president say that Trump will stop at nothing this time around to implement his legislative agenda.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.