Thousands of Mainers expect to see boost in Social Security under bill before President Biden
- Bias Rating
-14% Somewhat Liberal
- Reliability
40% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-30% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
25% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
59% : From there, she said, it will take time for the Social Security Administration to recalculate the benefits for everyone affected.55% : That's when she learned she wouldn't be able to collect the full amount of Social Security benefits she had earned through part-time work and other odd jobs because of her career as a public school teacher.
55% : The Windfall Elimination Provision reduces the benefits available to public employees who don't pay into Social Security through their government retirement plans, regardless of their contributions through other jobs.
54% : Some public sector employees in Maine still pay into Social Security if they also work or have worked in the private sector.
54% : Other spouses are eligible for between 71% and 100% of their loved one's benefits, according to the Social Security Administration, whereas the Government Pension Offset can result in the survivor not getting any spousal benefits.
53% : Meanwhile, in some states, certain public sector employees do contribute to Social Security through their government retirement plans and therefore are not subject to the two provisions.
51% : Right now, because of the Windfall Elimination Provision, she gets 40% of what she's earned in Social Security, or about $350 per month after Medicare is deducted.
50% : They won't have to think they're risking their prior earnings that they had been putting away into Social Security.
50% : "Why should I be penalized because Congress decided that was an easy target to get more revenue (from Social Security) to someone else?
46% : The 73-year-old Brunswick resident estimates he's lost about $93,000 in the 13 years, or $600 per month, since he started drawing Social Security in 2011.
44% : "Vicky Edwards, a retired teacher from Otisfield, has felt the loss of Social Security through the Government Pension Offset, which reduces the survivor benefits available to the spouse of a Social Security recipient -- if the surviving spouse has their own government pension.
39% : She has a pension from her teaching work, but said it's "not a livable pension," so Social Security from her other jobs is an important piece of her retirement.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.