Modern Diplomacy Article Rating

Trump 2.0: A Return to "Maximum Pressure" against Iran?

Dec 07, 2024 View Original Article
  • Bias Rating

    -2% Center

  • Reliability

    85% ReliableGood

  • Policy Leaning

    80% Very Conservative

  • Politician Portrayal

    -51% Negative

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

-18% Negative

  •   Liberal
  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

58% : Netanyahu's alignment with Trump during the latter's first term yielded major geopolitical wins for Israel, such as US recognition of Jerusalem as its capital.
57% : However, Trump also claimed to favor Iran's success, albeit with the caveat that it "can't have nuclear weapons.
41% : All the Presidents' MenThe interplay between the hardliners surrounding Trump and the entrenched factions in Iran underscores how "all the president's men" could shape and constrain U.S.-Iran relations.
38% : Will Trump 2.0 exploit Iran's vulnerabilities to foster engagement, or will tensions escalate further?
37% : Brian Hook, who oversaw Iran policy at the State Department in Trump's first term and is now in charge of the Trump transition for the department, has said that Trump is not seeking regime change but rather aims to weaken Iran's capacity to fund regional proxies like Hezbollah and the Houthis.
31% : As Trump prepares for a return to the White House, questions arise about his approach to Iran.
26% : Though Trump has been vague about his plans, many of his cabinet nominees support tougher sanctions.
25% : Trump defended the strike as a deterrent rather than an act of aggression, yet the rhetoric surrounding it suggested otherwise.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link