
Trump administration engaged in advanced planning for military strike on Iran
- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
25% ReliableLimited
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-44% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-17% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
57% : The 2015 Iran nuclear accord, also known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, was agreed between Iran the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council (the US, Britain, China, France, and Russia), and Germany.52% : As the Times article makes clear, Trump and his advisers, far from ruling out military action, have merely determined to put it on hold for the time being.
45% : Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian led a push for renewed talks with Washington in recent months, claiming that the election of Trump -- a notorious anti-Iran war-hawk -- could nevertheless provide an opening for sanctions relief.
41% : Trump's special envoy, the billionaire property speculator Steve Witkoff, is to meet with Iranian Foreign Minister Abas Araghchi to discuss Iran's nuclear programme and possible relief on the brutal sanctions Washington has imposed on Iran since Trump unilaterally pulled the US out of the UN-backed Iran nuclear accord in 2018.
39% : The UNSC resolution implementing the agreement allows for a so-called "snapback" of UN sanctions on Iran if Tehran is deemed by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to be "noncompliant" with the deal or if no new agreement is reached by October 2025.
37% : sends stealth bombers and aircraft carrier to the Middle East in threat against Iran2 April 2025Tehran makes overtures to Trump, as he prepares to escalate Washington's war on Iran30 November 2024The role of Iran's oil and gas in US war plans against China7 October 2024Israeli strikes on Iran: A dress rehearsal for a wider war30 October 2024Iran's run-off presidential election won by "reformer" advocating rapprochement with US imperialism as it sets Mideast ablaze7 July 2024Contact usRelated TopicsFind out more about these topics:IranMiddle EastWar and militarism
32% : Given the ongoing US/NATO war on Russia in Ukraine and Trump's trade war with China, there appears little prospect of Beijing and Moscow consenting to the reintroduction of UN sanctions on Iran at the behest of the Western powers.
28% : For the European imperialists, referred to as the "E3" in the context of talks on Iran's nuclear programme, the threat of reimposing UN sanctions remains one of the few diplomatic tools they possess to influence the current talks, from which they have been all but excluded by Trump.
20% : Trump has set a two-month deadline for reaching a new agreement with Iran, and has repeatedly declared that if the talks fail the US will attack Iran.
15% : Preparations to carry this out have intensified dramatically over the past 18 months, while the US under Biden and then Trump has provided unflinching support for Israel's genocide against the Palestinians.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.