Tucson Sentinel Article Rating

Trump asks Supreme Court to delay hush money sentencing - Click pic for more:

  • Bias Rating

    50% Medium Conservative

  • Reliability

    80% ReliableGood

  • Policy Leaning

    50% Medium Conservative

  • Politician Portrayal

    -50% Negative

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

1% Positive

  •   Liberal
  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

52% : Associate Justice Ellen Gesmer of New York's Appellate Division, First Department said that the proximity to the inauguration was due to motions filed by Trump, delaying his initial sentencing date in July.
49% : "The prospect of imposing sentence on President Trump just before he assumes Office as the 47th President raises the specter of other possible restrictions on liberty, such as travel, reporting requirements, registration, probationary requirements, and others -- all of which would be constitutionally intolerable under the doctrine of Presidential immunity," John Sauer, Trump's attorney and pick for solicitor general, wrote.
40% : In a blockbuster ruling favoring Trump last June, the conservative supermajority on the Supreme Court found that former presidents had absolute immunity for duties within their core powers and some immunity for other official actions.
39% : Trump suggested he was entitled to an automatic pause on the New York trial court proceedings scheduled for Friday morning because he is pursuing a presidential immunity claim challenging his conviction on 34 felony counts.
36% : Trump claims that his New York conviction relied on the evidentiary use of his official acts.
34% : "New York Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan, who presided over the hush money case, made an exception that Trump would be allowed to attend his sentencing remotely.
30% : A Manhattan jury found Trump guilty on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records last year.
30% : Merchan has ruled out jail time, suggesting he would seek unconditional discharge -- a sentence preserving the jury's verdict but preventing Trump from serving any punishment so he could focus on his presidency.
25% : Trump argued that any adjudication of his felony convictions carried collateral consequences even if imprisonment was off the table.
24% : Still, Trump says holding the hearing at "the apex of the presidential transition period" violates due process and New York criminal law.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link