Trump Claims Power to Fire Administrative Law Judges at Will
- Bias Rating
-18% Somewhat Liberal
- Reliability
80% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-33% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-25% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
55% : "Unelected and constitutionally unaccountable A.L.J.s have exercised immense power for far too long," he said.52% : The move was the latest step in the administration's unfolding assault on the basic structure of the federal government and on Congress' power to insulate various types of executive branch officials in sensitive positions from political interference from the White House.
45% : Examples of such officials include Social Security Administration judges who handle disputes about disability and retirement benefits; National Labor Relations Board judges who resolve unfair labor practice cases; and Federal Energy Regulatory Commission judges who hear disputes about matters like electric utilities and regional grids.
44% : To insulate the officials from political interference, Congress enacted a statute that says disciplinary action, including firings, may be taken against such judges "only for good cause established and determined by the Merit Systems Protection Board on the record after opportunity for hearing before the board.
41% : In a statement, Chad Mizelle, the chief of staff to Attorney General Pam Bondi, hailed the administration's move to challenge the statute insulating administrative law judges from political interference by the White House.
23% : The Trump administration told Congress on Thursday that it believed President Trump had the constitutional power to summarily fire administrative law judges at will, despite a statute that protects such officials from being removed without a cause like misconduct.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.