Raw StoryTrump DHS liaison pushed 'martial law option' after 2020 election loss: CNN
- Bias Rating
-22% Somewhat Liberal
- Reliability
45% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-67% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-7% Negative
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
48% : The CNN report also details what Ingrassia has been up to since Trump reassumed power last month.42% : " ALSO READ: 'A boon to far-right extremists': Concern over Trump's new FBI Deputy Director grows In other posts on his podcast's blog, he called for Trump to institute martial law in four swing states so that they could do a "revote" of the election.
34% : In social media posts and podcast appearances reviewed by CNN, Ingrassia pushed for "secession" if the Supreme Court did not overturn the results of the 2020 election, and also called on Trump to declare martial law to remain in power.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
