Trump Files Hail Mary Motion Demanding Federal Judge Cancel NY Case

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

54% : And taken with Trump v. US, that means ...
48% : But now Trump claims that the Supreme Court's immunity ruling changes the landscape completely and entitles him to post-trial relief.
46% : This morning, Trump tried again docketing a two-page memorandum of law in support of his motion for relief, that gestured toward "paragraphs 12 and 116 - 146 of the Second Removal Notice" and demanded that Judge Hellerstein punch his ticket -- a punch
43% : They also omit to mention that they are currently pursuing identical claims in state court, and that they vigorously pressed those claims during the nine weeks since the Supreme Court ruled in Trump v. US.
39% : Last year when he tried to convince the court that he'd been paying Michael Cohen $35,000 per month for actual legal work, Trump specifically disavowed any claim of presidential immunity:DANY argues that there is a "serious question . . .
31% : Trump failed to seek such permission, and so he got summarily kicked.
28% : But if Trump can get Judge Hellerstein to take the bait, he can postpone the sentencing and then fight about it after the election.
24% : In June of 2023, when Trump first sought to remove the case, Judge Alvin Hellerstein ruled that none of the underlying conduct related to his official presidential duties.
22% : Instead Blanche and Bove advance a bizarre theory about the end of Chevron deference (which they call Raimondo instead of Loper-Bright, for reasons unclear) and the Supreme Court's ruling in Trump v. Anderson, which barred states from kicking him off the presidential ballot just because he tried to overthrow the government.
22% : They seem to be suggesting that the prosecution based its felony claims on Trump covering up violations of state and local election law, and that in turn violates the Supremacy Clause?

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.