Trump Promises To 'un-Ban' Biden's Offshore Drilling Ban
- Bias Rating
62% Medium Conservative
- Reliability
75% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
64% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-39% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-40% Negative
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
62% : America is in the midst of a period of energy innovation and massive addition, with no real transition taking place.60% : Oil, natural gas, and coal currently provide about 80% of the world's primary energy, and that could still be the case 50 or 100 years from now.
49% : "Trump certainly has the power to challenge Biden's order, which is grounded in Section 12 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act of 1953.
48% : No one really knows if Trump can fulfill his promise to "un-ban it," but he certainly should try.
42% : "Even though global organizations like the United Nations and many national governments seem certain to keep up their efforts to subsidize an energy transition into reality, the truth is that no one really knows whether that project can succeed before governments run out of money to keep funding the ever-increasing subsidies required.
29% : A reading of that section indicates a clear congressional intent that it be used only for national defense reasons and during times of national emergency, but several past presidents - including Barack Obama and Trump himself - have used this provision as justification for past drilling bans.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.