EconoTimes Article RatingTrump SLAMS Duke Lacrosse Accuser: 'Lives Destroyed' After Shocking Lie Comes to Light - EconoTimes
- Bias Rating
50% Medium Conservative
- Reliability
25% ReliablePoor
- Policy Leaning
50% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-67% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-51% Negative
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
29% : Trump's Commentary Sparks Public DebateTrump's statement has amplified public discussions surrounding the case, with many agreeing that Mangum's actions irreparably damaged the lives of the accused.23% : She destroyed the lives of these young men," Trump wrote, reigniting national discourse over one of the most polarizing legal scandals of the last two decades.
21% : However, the damage to the players' reputations and lives had already been done, a point Trump highlighted in his criticism.
15% : Trump took to his Truth Social platform to denounce Mangum's actions, asserting that her lies caused irreparable harm to the falsely accused athletes.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.