Trump's Cabinet picks victims of bomb threats and swatting, FBI says
- Bias Rating
-10% Center
- Reliability
25% ReliablePoor
- Policy Leaning
24% Somewhat Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-51% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-36% Negative
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
31% : Others saying they had received threats included Brooke Rollins, whom Trump plans to nominate to lead the Agriculture Department; Scott Turner, his selection to run the Department of Housing and Urban Development; and Rep. Lori Chavez-DeRemer (R-Oregon), his choice for labor secretary.21% : Four of Trump's selections said they had received threats to their homes, including Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-New York), whom Trump has tapped for U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, and former congressman Lee Zeldin (R-New York), the president-elect's choice for Environmental Protection Agency administrator.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.