Trump's incoming 'canceled' Cabinet know full well the censorship...

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

55% : At the top of the administrative state, Trump has placed people keenly aware of government's yen for intimidating its own citizens.
54% : And Elon Musk, appointed to lead a newly created Department of Government Efficiency, knowingly overpaid for Twitter to give Americans a sphere for free speech.
50% : The secretary of defense should be a man with the wisdom of George C. Marshall, Noonan said: someone "substantial and serious," capable of running the "highly bureaucratized bureaucracy that is the Department of Defense"; a "serious diplomat" -- not a "culture warrior" and Fox News host, such as Pete Hegseth, Trump's nominee, a winner of two Bronze Stars who has completed tours in Iraq, Afghanistan and Guantánamo.
41% : Melania and Barron Trump were told that they could not open bank accounts, according to the first lady's recent memoir.
31% : Venture capitalist Marc Andreessen recently expressed what many felt at the re-election of Donald Trump: not triumph so much as relief.
29% : Trump's detractors claim, through mouthfuls of sour grapes, that he is merely appointing "Trump loyalists."
26% : " Robert F. Kennedy Jr. hoped to oppose Trump in the general election until just a few months ago; he's not exactly a Trump crony, either.
8% : The Biden White House and surgeon general pressured social-media companies to censor Stanford epidemiologist Jay Bhattacharya's attempts to warn the public that the COVID lockdowns were the biggest policy error in American history; Trump named Bhattacharya to head the National Institutes of Health.
0% : But no honest evaluator could term Gabbard (until recently, a Democrat), physician and lockdown skeptic Bhattacharya (never previously affiliated with Trump or MAGA), or Marco Rubio (who ran against Trump and has harshly criticized him) "Trump loyalists.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.