
Trump's picks to run FDA and NIH win approval from Senate's health committee
- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
75% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
42% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-31% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
16% Positive
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
46% : Bhattacharya also stopped short of committing to reinstate certain programs, such as grants for LGBTQ research, or reversing a cap on indirect payments to universities, leaving research institutions on unsure footing with the NIH.30% : Makary and Bhattacharya both largely breezed through Senate confirmation hearings, but they still have their work cut out for them as they work to implement President Trump and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s 'Make America Healthy Again' agenda.
28% : Separately on Thursday, Trump pulled the nomination of Dave Weldon to run the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, hours before Cassidy's committee was set to question him during a hearing.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.