U.S. Supreme Court ruling kills broad EPA plan to ditch coal for renewables - 89.3 WFPL News Louisville
- Bias Rating
-10% Center
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
-64% Medium Liberal
- Politician Portrayal
-42% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
67% : A U.S. Supreme Court decision issued Thursday could severely limit the Environmental Protection Agency's ability to move the nation towards renewable energy.56% :Environmental groups in the region are appalled at the ruling, while coal industry supporters are celebrating a victory.
45% :No matter the decision, utilities may continue to move away from coal anyways.
44% : "We're committed to not burn coal beyond 2050 unless it is mitigated with carbon dioxide removal technologies [It] really doesn't change our plans at this stage," she said.
43% : The ruling stems from a lawsuit filed by coal companies and states, including Kentucky and West Virginia, seeking to curb the federal agency's ability to regulate carbon emissions.
37% : Meanwhile, Kentucky Republican Attorney General Daniel Cameron tweeted the ruling would prevent an "extreme climate change agenda" from causing "irreparable damage" to the coal industry.
35% : "It is not plausible that Congress gave EPA the authority to adopt on its own such a regulatory scheme," Roberts wrote in the majority opinion.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.