We Haven't Seen a Fight like Harvard v. Trump in Centuries

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

48% : The most notable feature of his recent interview with The New York Times was his utter indifference to the role university research has played as a contributor to the economic competitiveness and societal well-being of the United States.
47% : But the underlying issue is the same: Can the government take control of an institution of higher education?
45% : Some on the right argue that the actions of the Trump administration are necessary to roll back previous and equally extensive impositions of Democratic administrations on the workings of higher education.
40% : But McCarthy did not propose to embed government spying into the daily operations of a private organization.
34% : But McCarthyism provides only a pale comparison to what Trump is doing.
26% : But the notion that Trump is simply engaged in a necessary rebalancing will not hold water.
25% : " Given sentiments like these, Harvard vs. Trump is a fight that may have been destined to happen.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.