KRON4West Valley may build new homes in risky fire zones
- Bias Rating
14% Somewhat Conservative
- Reliability
40% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
14% Somewhat Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-31% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
56% : Mitigation measures include fire-resistant construction materials and defensible space, which creates a buffer between the project and surrounding vegetation to slow the spread of fire.44% : Some of the proposed projects in the very high risk zone are using builder's remedy, a state law exempting developers from local zoning standards enacted when municipalities are late earning state approval on mandated housing plans.
43% : Kurt Anderson, principal at Anderson Architects which is working on the plans for 101 S. Santa Cruz Ave., said his firm follows the wildland urban interface building code requiring developers to reduce wildfire risk.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
