ReasonWhat Is The Remedy For Judge Wynn's "Brazenly Partisan" Withdrawal of Senior Status?
- Bias Rating
28% Somewhat Conservative
- Reliability
50% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
48% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-14% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-2% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
55% : Yesterday, I wrote about Wynn's "brazenly partisan" withdrawal of his intent to take senior status because Trump prevailed.43% : Professor Rob Leider suggested that Trump should go ahead an nominate somone, and let the Senate confirm them:Another colleague wrote that Congress should pass an appropriations riders saying notwithstanding any other statutory provision, no funds may be spent on staff or chambers of judges who withdraw their senior status request.
13% : After Justice Ginsburg called President Trump a "faker" and worse, she apologized, but declined to recuse.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.