Check out this free eBook to learn more about detecting misinformation in the news.

Where Things Stand: Blake Masters Wipes Extreme Abortion Views From Campaign Website
- Bias Rating
-10% Center
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-57% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Center
-10%
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
50% : According to NBC News -- which took screenshots of Masters website before and after he posted the ad on Twitter -- Masters tweaked and changed several of his previous stances on abortion today, including deleting his stance on fetal personhood.46% : Before this morning, Masters' campaign website proudly declared the GOP Senate nominee's stance on abortion as "100% pro-life," while outlining the specifics of his views on a federal fetal personhood law: "a federal personhood law (ideally a Constitutional amendment) that recognizes that unborn babies are human beings that may not be killed." That, along with other elements of his (now-past?) extreme positions on abortion have been deleted from his website, according to NBC News.
46% : Now the website states he backs "a law or a Constitutional amendment that bans late term (third trimester) abortion and partial-birth abortion at the federal level" and "pro-life legislation, pregnancy centers, and programs that make it easier for pregnant women to support a family and decide to choose life."
43% : Judges Reach Dueling Conclusions In Fight Over Abortions During Emergencies Timeline: What We Know About The Missing Text Message Scandal -- Kaila Philo Calculate how much of your student loan debt can be forgiven -- Dylan Moriarty and Alyssa Fowers Too many Americans live in places built for cars -- not for human connection -- Muizz Akhtar
38% : Earlier today, Masters posted this ad on Twitter, seemingly staking out a new position on abortion that he has not held publicly since the beginning of his campaign.
37% : As Washington Post writer Aaron Blake outlined in this piece today, Masters' shifting and squirming on abortion isn't unique to him.
37% : The Post suggests that there are a number of factors playing into Republicans' quiet regrets on abortion, including new polling on support for the procedure from Pew Research and Democrats' better-than-expected performance in special elections and primaries in the weeks since Roe's overturning, specifically in the surprising outcome of the New York 19th District primaries this week.
35% : In this new ad he describes his views on abortion as "commonsense," suggesting that he supports bans only in certain situations "on very late-term and partial-birth abortion," while falsely claiming that Kelly wants abortion to be legal up until the moment of birth.
33% : It would effectively ban abortion nationwide by declaring the procedure to be murder.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.


Check out this free eBook to learn more about detecting misinformation in the news.