Who Better to Address Sexual Assault in the Military Than a Man Who Has Been Accused of Sexual Assault?
- Bias Rating
8% Center
- Reliability
70% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
20% Somewhat Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-36% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-10% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
52% : Given that the Department of Defense has a long history of wasting taxpayer dollars -- everything from $2 trillion fighter jets to $1,200 coffee mugs -- Hegseth's incompetence with money is yet another feather in his cap.45% : The allegations are the perfect distraction from the other so-called disqualifying factors, like his alcoholism, his financial malfeasance, his ties to Christian nationalism, or the fact that he has repeatedly called for a holy war.
42% : It's proven time and time again to be the most reliable way to get a Republican man into a position of power, and there's no better evidence of this than Donald Trump himself.
32% : If anything, Donald Trump should be putting forward more candidates with credible allegations of sexual assault against them.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.