Winsome Earle-Sears Virginia campaign plagued by problems

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

45% : A day later, former state Sen. Amanda Chase, who pitched herself as "Trump in heels," also entered the race, further complicating Earle-Sears's bid for the nomination.
45% : "If you add up the fact that Virginia voted against Trump three times and the disruptions of the federal workforce, which you might feel more of in Virginia than in other places, you start stacking up some advantages for Spanberger," Kondik said.
43% : Trump has not endorsed anyone in the Virginia primary yet but Earle-Sears's chances aren't looking good with two mega-MAGA candidates also vying for his blessing.
40% : Since then, Trump has nominated Cao, a combat veteran who has pushed for a military of "alpha males and alpha females" for Navy undersecretary.
39% : Dave LaRock, a former state delegate from Loudoun County, announced last month he would run against Earle-Sears, promising an Elon Musk-like approach to cutting waste through a "Virginia Department of Government Efficiency."
38% : Both newcomers have lost lower state-level races, both have embraced Trump and the MAGA movement, and both seem to be punching above their weight class for a shot at the governor's mansion, political analyst Kyle Kondik told the Washington Examiner.
27% : " Chase has faulted Earle-Sears for allegedly turning her back on Trump supporters and has claimed it's Earle-Sears who may struggle to qualify for the primary ballot, citing campaign "turnover and upheaval.
26% : Virginia is one of the states most affected by Trump and Musk's moves to shrink the federal workforce.
25% : "People want a candidate that has not denounced President Trump.
24% : " "Winsome Earle-Sears has alienated a lot of Trump supporters when she said she didn't support Trump's second run for president," Chase told the Virginia Mercury.
18% : Trump in turn has referred to her as a "phony."

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.