No, Donald Trump was not criminally prosecuted for taking out, repaying loan | Fact check
- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
90% ReliableExcellent
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-47% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-4% Negative
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
47% : An appeals court ruled in late March that Trump and his co-defendants only have to post a $175 million bond or deposit to shield their assets as they pursue an appeal in the case.43% : In the end, Engoron ordered Trump to pay $453.5 million in penalties and interest.
36% : A trial to determine what penalties Trump and his company would face began in early October of that year and lasted for more than two months.
34% : "So when Trump takes out a loan and pays it back with interest it's a crime but when you take out a student loan and don't pay it back, then Biden forgives the loan, steals money from the taxpayers to pay it back it's not a crime," reads the post.
26% : James' lawsuit was handled in civil - not criminal - court, meaning Trump was not accused of a crime in the case, as the post claims.
26% : Judge Arthur Engoron, who presided over the case, ruled in late September of last year that Trump and his company committed fraud for years by overvaluing assets, including some of his well-known properties, and inflating his worth on financial statements.
25% : The post is also wrong about the circumstances that led to the lawsuit - and later to a massive financial penalty for Trump.
23% : While Trump never faced criminal charges in the New York fraud case, he does face criminal charges in several other cases.
21% : Fact check: No evidence of Trump selling 'holy oil' to fund legal billsThe financial penalties were based on "ill-gotten gains" Trump acquired by exaggerating his wealth, including money he saved from lower interest rates on loans and profits from selling properties he otherwise would not have been able to develop.
20% : New York's attorney general sued Trump for fraudulently inflating his wealth on financial statements used to get loans and insurance, not for taking out and repaying a loan.
19% : The Trump case referenced in the post is civil, not criminal, which means Trump was not accused of a crime.
9% : The post refers to a lawsuit filed against Trump in 2022 by New York Attorney General Letitia James, who claimed Trump and his company routinely exaggerated his wealth on financial statements used to secure loans and insurance.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.