Not OK, boomers: Why your future Social Security benefits may be much less than promised
- Bias Rating
-2% Center
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
-36% Somewhat Liberal
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
59% : Before Congress spends more time and money on other priorities, lawmakers need to turn their attention to the stability of Social Security.59% : At this point, the average voter hears that the experts at the Social Security Administration believe that Social Security is fine until 2035, at which point incoming revenues will be sufficient to cover only about 75% of scheduled benefits.
44% : The hard truth is that we do not know much about the future of Social Security.
42% : The issue stems from the way Social Security integrates average wages into the benefit calculation.
41% : To state the obvious, if the financial imbalances of Social Security were manageable, they would not be growing.
35% : The passage of time is a cancer to Social Security.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.