Opinion | D.C. leaders must work together to advance equity for students
- Bias Rating
-4% Center
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
-4% Center
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
56% :Too often, the conversation on how to improve education outcomes for students in our city focuses on the distinction between charter schools and D.C.54% : That's why leaders across the district -- including in charter schools, D.C.
47% : For example, some point to charter schools as the reason that neighborhood middle schools in Wards 7 and 8 are lagging behind the rest of the city in academic outcomes.
45% : Public Schools schools.
41% : Public Schools, Mayor Muriel E. Bowser's (D) administration and the D.C. Council -- must focus on creatively and consistently advancing equity.
28% : Critics often point to data showing that most students living in Ward 3 (which has no charter schools) attend their neighborhood school, and most students living in Wards 7 and 8 (which have charter schools) do not.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.