Washington Post Article RatingOpinion | Republicans never had a replacement plan for Obamacare
- Bias Rating
-8% Center
- Reliability
35% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
N/A
- Politician Portrayal
-22% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
77% : Despite promises throughout the Trump administration that a "terrific" health-care plan to replace the Affordable Care Act was just around the corner, no plan ever came.45% : And nothing is what former president Donald Trump (and the entire GOP) have offered since the Affordable Care Act was signed into law March 23, 2010.
16% : Regarding Ramesh Ponnuru's Nov. 28 op-ed, "Why Trump should stop trying to repeal Obamacare":You can't replace something with nothing.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.