Over 600 Join PRH in Asking Media: Stop Quoting Antis

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

61% : I have personally been declining any media that is also featuring anti-abortion extremists.
59% : As an abortion provider in Wichita, Kansas, the clinic where I work, my coworkers, and the patients who come to get care at our clinic are all constantly under real threat of anti-abortion groups harassing us day in and day out.
59% :Physicians for Reproductive Health Board Member Dr. Ghazaleh Moayedi adds:"When journalists and reporters present anti-abortion ideology and misinformation as a counter-point to evidence-based medicine, they are directly serving as a mouth-piece for extremist groups with direct ties to white supremacist organizing.
44% : Reporting on abortion should celebrate that fact, not directly threaten people who have and provide abortions.
36% :Physicians for Reproductive Health and the over 600 signers agree that there is no validity to claims that reporting must cover "both sides" of abortion.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.