PHOTO GALLERY | Minnesota's Warian wins Sunnehanna Amateur Tournament for Champions amid final hole drama
- Bias Rating
Center
- Reliability
40% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
-90% Very Liberal
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
27% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
87% : "Summy put together an amazing stretch, with a birdie on the par-three No. 10, followed by an eagle on the par-five No. 11.58% : He hit back-to-back birdies on 12 and 13 to reach 13-under.Bogeys on 14 and 16 sandwiched his final birdie of the round on No. 15."I was just still trying to play my game," Summy said.
56% : "I'm not happy with the result, but I'm proud of my fight.
56% : "Playing in the final group, Jackson made birdie on No. 1 and followed with birdie putts on 3, 11 and 18.
56% : "Herendeen held a one-stroke lead entering the final round and played well enough to land at 13-under following a birdie on No. 13, but he had bogeys on 14 and 15 followed by a double bogey on 16.
49% : Something happens in my mind and I start kicking it into gear and making putts.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.