Previous Troubling Reports

This article is overall extremely biased. It paints former Secretary Noem in an extremely negative light. The two biggest biases shown are that it omits that a lot of Noem's actions were supported by the President and that many DHS secretaries have taken similar actions. It makes unsupported claims about her popularity. Although reliable numbers on the approval of secretaries can be hard to find, the latest one from 2025 showed she had large support amongst Republicans, and although way less popular with Democrats and non-committed voters, still wasn't the least popular. A few tweets isn't evidence.

From the start, the article frames Representative Al Green as the politician who "repeatedly tried to impeach Trump" which influences the reader's opinion of the politician they are about to read about. Green's involvement in Trump's impeachment is something which could be mentioned later in the article as part of the candidate's background. However, including this in the headline already introduces bias. There is also a literal mistake made in the headline. Wikipedia defines Impeachment as "Impeachment is a process by which a legislative body or other legally constituted tribunal initiates charges against a public official for misconduct." This means that Trump was impeached, he was not removed from office (which would be the result of conviction), but he was impeached. The article portrays Green as failing to impeach the President and that is not what it means to impeach.

This article is attempting to push a narrative that the team USA men's hockey team got poor reception upon returning home. However, it ignores that after they left the gate they had a large line of fans asking for autographs. It's important to note that security is tight in airport gates. You can't get in without a ticket. Even people who did have a ticket were likely told by security to stay under control. The seemingly mild response in the video is likely due to these regulations. Along with having a larger line of fans outside of the gate, they also have had large fan events in their respective hometowns. Although the article does mention they landed in a city not known for hockey, they failed to mention the individual events that were scheduled for the players.

The headline of this article is true, Acemoglu did warn about the survival of US democracy. However, the title is formatted to scare people and already influences readers before they begin. It is valid to experience feelings when reading an article, but it is preferable that those feelings are in reaction to the reader's own mind rather than what the writer is manipulating the reader into feeling.

Factually speaking this article is fine. However, it provides an oversimplification of the justice's reasoning for ruling against Trump's new tariffs. There's more detail on Kavanaugh's dissent. The description of Kavanaugh's dissent is also an oversimplification and doesn't make sense from a legal standpoint. This article feels like it's trying to push the dissenting narrative instead of properly explaining why 6 justices ruled the way they did.

This article is very partisan and is only geared towards the left. Though the title is taken from quotes from Obama, this article is not objective. The quote was chosen to grab the most attention from readers by evoking an emotional reaction. It aims to inform the public of opinions and to solidify the opinions of the reader rather than providing them with information to learn. Little was said about the current political climate and the facts of Trump's presidency. The majority of the article was composed of Obama quotes and ended in Obama quotes. This article was not impartial.

This article has a couple of issues that can be seen from the title. First, "felon" Trump is misleading considering he's pardoning them as the President using powers he legally has. Secondly, disgraced is a disputed claims, one of the players pardoned was inducted into the Pro Football Hall of Fame.

This article has a couple of issues that can be seen from the title. First, "felon" Trump is misleading considering he's pardoning them as the President using powers he legally has. Secondly, disgraced is a disputed claims, one of the players pardoned was inducted into the Pro Football Hall of Fame.

This article was not informative but rather persuasive. It read more like a blog than a news source. It did not include any opposing information and demanded action of readers. They claimed that Senate Republicans had no interest in choosing the nominees and were being "lazy" and the headline even talks of what is "deserved." This is purely subjective and should not be taken seriously.

This article was not informative but rather persuasive. It read more like a blog than a news source. It did not include any opposing information and demanded action of readers. They claimed that Senate Republicans had no interest in choosing the nominees and were being "lazy" and the headline even talks of what is "deserved." This is purely subjective and should not be taken seriously.

This article fails to mention the University failed safety requirements. Instead they paint the narrative that the wind turbine alone caused the bald eagles death.

This article is fine factually, but leaving out that a division of ICE was apart of the 2024 olympics in Paris makes the article feel like it's pushing a narrative. I would recommend less bias sources on this subject matter.