Previous Troubling Reports

I do not believe that there is anything inherently "misinformation" within this article, but the bias seen within it may sway public perception into agreeing with them. One of the first quotes you see from author James Downie is, "1) he is unpopular; 2) neither he nor anyone around him has any plan to change point 1; 3) despite points 1 and 2, major corporations and institutions continue to bow before the man who would be king", which feels false as there are many people who actually do support President Trump. This is behavior similar that agrees with MSNBC's Somewhat Left bias, but it is still worth pointing out. This exclusion of opposite viewpoints is one that speaks to a high level of bias, and potential misinformation in the future if measures are not taken.

I do not believe that there is anything inherently "misinformation" within this article, but the bias seen within it may sway public perception into agreeing with them. One of the first quotes you see from author James Downie is, "1) he is unpopular; 2) neither he nor anyone around him has any plan to change point 1; 3) despite points 1 and 2, major corporations and institutions continue to bow before the man who would be king", which feels false as there are many people who actually do support President Trump. This is behavior similar that agrees with MSNBC's Somewhat Left bias, but it is still worth pointing out. This exclusion of opposite viewpoints is one that speaks to a high level of bias, and potential misinformation in the future if measures are not taken.

This is spreading misinformation because it is connecting things that don't have anything to do with each other, with no evidence that they are connected. The claim is that President Trump's disagreement with Cracker Barrel changing its logo was just a distraction for Republicans from President Trump's poor policies. However, this is simply not true, which makes the title of the article clickbait.

There is slight misinformation and biases within this article by Politico. First off the article claims Elon Musk was the "former leader" of a government department named DOGE, which is false. He has, however, been associated with a hypothetical "Department of Government Efficiency" concept is proposed by many political figures. In addition, the articles references people like Representative Pete Sessions and Elon Musk are used to lend a false credibility to the fictional premise.

There is slight misinformation and biases within this article by Politico. First off the article claims Elon Musk was the "former leader" of a government department named DOGE, which is false. He has, however, been associated with a hypothetical "Department of Government Efficiency" concept is proposed by many political figures. In addition, the articles references people like Representative Pete Sessions and Elon Musk are used to lend a false credibility to the fictional premise.

There is slight misinformation and biases within this article by Politico. First off the article claims Elon Musk was the "former leader" of a government department named DOGE, which is false. He has, however, been associated with a hypothetical "Department of Government Efficiency" concept is proposed by many political figures. In addition, the articles references people like Representative Pete Sessions and Elon Musk are used to lend a false credibility to the fictional premise.

There is slight misinformation and biases within this article by Politico. First off the article claims Elon Musk was the "former leader" of a government department named DOGE, which is false. He has, however, been associated with a hypothetical "Department of Government Efficiency" concept is proposed by many political figures. In addition, the articles references people like Representative Pete Sessions and Elon Musk are used to lend a false credibility to the fictional premise.

I think the headline speaks for itself in terms of misinforming the reader. It is not just the misleading headline that is disturbing, but what this provocative statement connotes in terms of what is acceptable: if the Democratic Party is a terrorist organization, then any form of suppression and violence is justifiable.

This news article is attempting to link Newsom/Pritzker comments about a social media trend around Trump to Charlie Kirk's assassination, which is completely unrelated.

There is nothing inherently misinformant within this article, but I do believe that the opinion within it can be unfair to other perspectives. There are many people who support Trump's immigration policies and many who don't, and this article does not. The information is helpful, but the bias within the article may tweak things so that the reader comes out with a shifted viewpoint.

There is nothing inherently misinformant within this article, but I do believe that the opinion within it can be unfair to other perspectives. There are many people who support Trump's immigration policies and many who don't, and this article does not. The information is helpful, but the bias within the article may tweak things so that the reader comes out with a shifted viewpoint.

The piece of misinformation that I found in this article is the claim that Trump made stating that "the mayor is happy." This claim is most likely not true because the mayor is a Democrat and will disagree with Trump's attempt at sending the National Guard to his city.