Previous Troubling Reports

Starbucks did not sponsor the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee last week. However, they were providing coffee and other beverages to first responders at five of the RNC venues, in order to uphold a partnership with a Milwaukee nonpartisan host committee. The news that they sponsored it is troubling because a sponsorship for an event of this magnitude has serious implications, and such a claim cannot be taken lightly. A multi-billion-dollar franchise like Starbucks may have their reputation put in jeopardy if they became politicized.

Starbucks did not sponsor the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee last week. However, they were providing coffee and other beverages to first responders at five of the RNC venues, in order to uphold a partnership with a Milwaukee nonpartisan host committee. The news that they sponsored it is troubling because a sponsorship for an event of this magnitude has serious implications, and such a claim cannot be taken lightly. A multi-billion-dollar franchise like Starbucks may have their reputation put in jeopardy if they became politicized.

Starbucks did not sponsor the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee last week. However, they were providing coffee and other beverages to first responders at five of the RNC venues, in order to uphold a partnership with a Milwaukee nonpartisan host committee. The news that they sponsored it is troubling because a sponsorship for an event of this magnitude has serious implications, and such a claim cannot be taken lightly. A multi-billion-dollar franchise like Starbucks may have their reputation put in jeopardy if they became politicized.

Starbucks did not sponsor the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee last week. However, they were providing coffee and other beverages to first responders at five of the RNC venues, in order to uphold a partnership with a Milwaukee nonpartisan host committee. The news that they sponsored it is troubling because a sponsorship for an event of this magnitude has serious implications, and such a claim cannot be taken lightly. A multi-billion-dollar franchise like Starbucks may have their reputation put in jeopardy if they became politicized.

Starbucks did not sponsor the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee last week. However, they were providing coffee and other beverages to first responders at five of the RNC venues, in order to uphold a partnership with a Milwaukee nonpartisan host committee. The news that they sponsored it is troubling because a sponsorship for an event of this magnitude has serious implications, and such a claim cannot be taken lightly. A multi-billion-dollar franchise like Starbucks may have their reputation put in jeopardy if they became politicized.

Starbucks did not sponsor the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee last week. However, they were providing coffee and other beverages to first responders at five of the RNC venues, in order to uphold a partnership with a Milwaukee nonpartisan host committee. The news that they sponsored it is troubling because a sponsorship for an event of this magnitude has serious implications, and such a claim cannot be taken lightly. A multi-billion-dollar franchise like Starbucks may have their reputation put in jeopardy if they became politicized.

A photo from 2022 is circulating on twitter and people are claiming it was from the RNC. In actuality, it is from Vance's campaign for senate. This is concerning because people are using this information to fuel their hate towards a candidate, but the information is not true.

Trump is saying vaccinations are being given to babies that radically change them, when this has never been proven to be true. Additionally, he says some of these vaccinations have 38 different types of vaccinations in them, which does not exist. This is concerning because people look up to him and he is spreading false information to them.

The headline of this article is very misleading and is false. The Harris campaign said that, "the plan aimed to accelerate "the spread of electric vehicles, solar panels, and wind turbines" and make big investments "in battery storage, climate-smart agriculture, advanced manufacturing, and the innovative technologies that will build our carbon-free future. The headline makes readers think that Harris will take away their gas-powered cars (though not true) and could influence the way they feel about her as a candidate.

This news is particularly troubling for the way it displays clear bias against Harris's virality to push a narrative about the Democratic Party's unauthentic methods for gaining support. The author criticizes Harris's "memeability" and left-leaning media outlets such as NYT for celebrating her internet fame. They bring in sources that make the argument that Democrats are operating in a "post-coherence landscape," which is a threat to democracy, however, they don't bring in any sources arguing against this narrative or providing a different perspective. Therefore, it is evident that the author is showing clear bias towards the opinion that Harris's internet fame is damaging to the political landscape.

This news is particularly troubling for the way it displays clear bias against Harris's virality to push a narrative about the Democratic Party's unauthentic methods for gaining support. The author criticizes Harris's "memeability" and left-leaning media outlets such as NYT for celebrating her internet fame. They bring in sources that make the argument that Democrats are operating in a "post-coherence landscape," which is a threat to democracy, however, they don't bring in any sources arguing against this narrative or providing a different perspective. Therefore, it is evident that the author is showing clear bias towards the opinion that Harris's internet fame is damaging to the political landscape.

This is troubling because it portrays only the failures of Kamala without correctly balancing her strengths.