Previous Troubling Reports

Honestly, this article is deeply concerning. The amount of fear-based propaganda is extraordinary. It’s also quite revealing in its religious discrimination, especially against Muslims. First of all, Europe isn’t unlivable because of immigrants—the real issues are the lack of housing and the rising cost of food. With limited land and densely packed cities, many European countries have struggled to house their own citizens since the early 2000s. The article opens with the line: “Now that a critical mass of voters in our largest city have decided to support a socialist Muslim rapper from Uganda who openly despises every founding principle of this country…” a sentence loaded with xenophobic, Islamophobic, and racially charged implications. It then goes on to make wild claims that New York, under this so-called "Muslim socialist" ideology, would “eliminate the police department,” “nationalize the grocery stores,” and “fund sex changes for children.” These statements are not only exaggerated but have no grounding in actual policy proposals. To claim that New York would become “completely uninhabitable” under such a platform is irresponsible. Rather than promoting discussion or understanding, this kind of rhetoric fuels fear, division, and misinformation.

Honestly, this article is deeply concerning. The amount of fear-based propaganda is extraordinary. It’s also quite revealing in its religious discrimination, especially against Muslims. First of all, Europe isn’t unlivable because of immigrants—the real issues are the lack of housing and the rising cost of food. With limited land and densely packed cities, many European countries have struggled to house their own citizens since the early 2000s. The article opens with the line: “Now that a critical mass of voters in our largest city have decided to support a socialist Muslim rapper from Uganda who openly despises every founding principle of this country…” a sentence loaded with xenophobic, Islamophobic, and racially charged implications. It then goes on to make wild claims that New York, under this so-called "Muslim socialist" ideology, would “eliminate the police department,” “nationalize the grocery stores,” and “fund sex changes for children.” These statements are not only exaggerated but have no grounding in actual policy proposals. To claim that New York would become “completely uninhabitable” under such a platform is irresponsible. Rather than promoting discussion or understanding, this kind of rhetoric fuels fear, division, and misinformation.

This post accuses liberals of pushing culture of death and frames those who are prochoice as baby murderers. It also takes a hot topic about whether it is okay to euthanize you dying dog by shooting it instead of taking it to the vet as a partisan debate, and anyone who is pro-choice as a hypocrite. This is clearly a heavily slanted, loaded article.

The article uses a contentious issue as a platform to propagate insults and loaded phrasing against political sides the author stands against. It makes statements without supporting them. While they do work to support the claim in the headline itself with numbers, the article is premature in its celebration, considering the relative recency of President Trump's immigration policies. The extremely loaded language and loosely supported statements make this troubling news.

The article uses a contentious issue as a platform to propagate insults and loaded phrasing against political sides the author stands against. It makes statements without supporting them. While they do work to support the claim in the headline itself with numbers, the article is premature in its celebration, considering the relative recency of President Trump's immigration policies. The extremely loaded language and loosely supported statements make this troubling news.

This is misleading as I fact checked the claim with other sources and the claim is false.

While nothing is inherently incorrect in this article, it puts an extreme emphasis on the national impacts of the election. While there are some theories that this will send waves throughout the DNC, saying it definitely will may be an overstatement that, so far, has not had enough time to indicate what will happen.

While nothing is inherently incorrect in this article, it puts an extreme emphasis on the national impacts of the election. While there are some theories that this will send waves throughout the DNC, saying it definitely will may be an overstatement that, so far, has not had enough time to indicate what will happen.

While nothing is inherently incorrect in this article, it puts an extreme emphasis on the national impacts of the election. While there are some theories that this will send waves throughout the DNC, saying it definitely will may be an overstatement that, so far, has not had enough time to indicate what will happen.

While nothing is inherently incorrect in this article, it puts an extreme emphasis on the national impacts of the election. While there are some theories that this will send waves throughout the DNC, saying it definitely will may be an overstatement that, so far, has not had enough time to indicate what will happen.

While nothing is inherently incorrect in this article, it puts an extreme emphasis on the national impacts of the election. While there are some theories that this will send waves throughout the DNC, saying it definitely will may be an overstatement that, so far, has not had enough time to indicate what will happen.

While nothing is inherently incorrect in this article, it puts an extreme emphasis on the national impacts of the election. While there are some theories that this will send waves throughout the DNC, saying it definitely will may be an overstatement that, so far, has not had enough time to indicate what will happen.