Understand the bias, discover the truth in your news. Get Started

July 18, 2024

‘Shifty Adam Schiff’ Just Threw Biden Under the Bus

Why Troubling News:

To start, the title negatively portrays Schiff by calling him "shifty". The article also only takes quotes from Schiff, resulting in an absence of opposing sources. This lack of opposing sources creates a bias against Biden; Schiff believes that Biden should withdraw from the election, and there are no quotes stating that Biden should not withdraw. In this way, readers are encouraged to believe that Biden should withdraw.

July 18, 2024

Republicans Put Trump in Soft Focus, Editing Out Years of Rancor

Why Troubling News:

This article seeks to describe a “new” image of Donald Trump being put forward at the Republican National Convention in Milkwaukee. While it includes quotes from several of Trump’s family members and associates, it paints him in a negative light. The bias is very clear against him and his policies (expressed in the title alone). For example, author Adam Nagourney writes: “The gap between the reality of Mr. Trump and the portrait painted at his nominating convention may prove to be too vast for any Republican makeover.” Nagourney takes a rather subjective stance throughout this piece, which makes it difficult for readers to form unbiased opinions. If the author had omitted personal statements and beliefs, the report would be more reliable.

July 18, 2024

Joy Reid suggest Biden recovering from COVID is ‘exactly the same thing’ as Trump surviving an assassination

Why Troubling News:

Although somewhat true, the article title and its contents tend to take a quote out of context and misconstrue its meaning. An MSNBC host said that Biden recovering from COVID presents himself as overcoming a challenge and allows him an opportunity to show strength, similar to how Trump has so far handled himself after an assassination attempt on him. However, the way the article words things and orders quotes makes the MSNBC host seem very partisan, almost to say she suggested that COVID is worse than a bullet. However, she never claims this, nor does she really downplay the assassination attempt.

July 17, 2024

Biden calls Vance ‘a clone of Trump’ in first remarks on VP nominee

Why Troubling News:

The article does well at including both sides of the issue, by quoting and paraphrasing words from both those in favor of Trump's choice of Vance as vice president, and those against it. However, some parts place the Biden-Harris campaign and Democrats in a negative frame. For example, the author writes, "The Biden-Harris campaign wasted no time attacking Vance, despite Biden’s Sunday evening call on Americans to 'lower the temperature' after Trump was wounded in a Saturday afternoon assassination attempt." Another section states, "The selection of Vance kicked the Democratic opposition research teams into gear...opposition research teams will have an opportunity to try to spook the public on Vance..."

July 16, 2024

Exclusive: Secret Service ramped up security after receiving intel of Iranian plot to assassinate Trump; no known connection to shootingExclusive: Secret Service ramped up security after receiving intel of Iranian plot to assassinate Trump; no known connection to shooting

Why Troubling News:

For starters, this article continuously raises questions about how a 20-year-old gunman was able to get on the roof of a building so close to the rally. They portray Trump's administration negatively as if they were unprepared or careless with security. The author clearly has a liberal stance on the issue, as it is made clear throughout the article that the Secret Service warned Trump that these types of gatherings were dangerous, especially in light of recent threats.

July 16, 2024

Democrats and the media brought Trump Derangement Syndrome to a fever pitch. Now it’s drawn blood

Why Troubling News:

The article is troubling because it uses highly charged, partisan language and lacks balance by failing to present counterarguments from Trump’s opponents. It speculates without concrete evidence, suggesting anti-Trump rhetoric directly led to the assassination attempt, and places significant blame on Trump’s political enemies for creating a hostile environment. The piece includes inflammatory statements that deepen political divisions, discredits the Democratic Party and media without fair analysis, and relies on emotional appeals rather than logical arguments, manipulating readers' opinions.

July 15, 2024

What We Know About Trump Rally Shooter Thomas Matthew Crooks

Why Troubling News:

This article is quick to point out the fact that Crooks allegedly donated to ActBlue, which supports democrats, while barely mentioning his republican political affiliation. This indicates that the author wants to push an agenda, and articulates the information in a specific way in order to do so.

July 14, 2024

What did hard Left expect, after years of hateful anti-Trump rhetoric?

Why Troubling News:

I think from the title alone this news is troubling as the reader is now facing extreme bias from the first line they read due to the name calling and partisan divide this article is creating. Further the entire article goes on to criticize and blame one party and makes very unequal and troubling comparisons throughout the article. It is so biased that there is no attempt at all to understand the other side's perspective or offer a counterargument. Further, the article jumps to conclusions without showing how they got there and is making assumptions with large gaps which is scary to read especially when the article is discussing death as one of the conclusions.

July 14, 2024

“Here’s how to watch Biden’s news conference as he tries to quiet doubts after his poor debate”

Why Troubling News:

Although the article is short, it is filled with displays of bias against Biden's debate performance, including the headline. Facts are presented in the story, such as details about Biden's upcoming news conference, but everything else is largely the author's opinion. There are almost no sources to back up the author's claims, so the author is doing less reporting and more opinion-writing.