Previous Troubling Reports

This article weaponizes facts to misconstrue the truth. Essentially, they use one poll source and exaggerate, claiming that a loss in Iowa would spell doom on the Biden campaign. True, Trump's conviction has emboldened Iowa voters to choose him over Biden. However, does the Iowa campaign spell disaster for Biden's entire campaign? Not entirely. The rhetoric used here is misleading for a purpose-to get more clicks and more attention, instead of reporting the truth unadulterated.

This article weaponizes facts to misconstrue the truth. Essentially, they use one poll source and exaggerate, claiming that a loss in Iowa would spell doom on the Biden campaign. True, Trump's conviction has emboldened Iowa voters to choose him over Biden. However, does the Iowa campaign spell disaster for Biden's entire campaign? Not entirely. The rhetoric used here is misleading for a purpose-to get more clicks and more attention, instead of reporting the truth unadulterated.

The article in the Daily Mail claims that President Joe Biden mistakenly tried to sit down in a chair that wasn't there - attributing the mistake to his old age. However, the video evidence for this claim is doctored to make this seem like it happened when it did not. The article aims to show that Biden is confused in his old age, hinting that he is unfit for the job of president. However, the basis for this claim is false.

The article aims to take Trump's quote out of context. Although he did say that the city of Milwaukee was "horrible", he was talking about its supposed crime rates. It has become headline news because the city will host the Republican National Convention. The article said that Republicans have conflicted understandings of what Trump meant. The article tries to show division amongst Republicans and portray them as always being conflicted on issues.

Author of the article continuously uses derogatory terms and makes false claims. - Example: "As a consequence of these changes, ..., every public school and college in the U.S. must allow male transvestites into women's locker rooms and restrooms". Here the author uses 'transvestites' to refer to trans people, reducing the whole issue to only clothes and restrooms. Author also implies that supporting trans women is an attack on feminism... which is not. Author makes it seem as if by supporting trans women you are allowing biological males to prey on women's rights which is also not the case. All in all, author tries to justify anti-trans sentiments by dressing them up as "protecting real women".

Article uses pro-Palestine and anti-Israel as if they were synonyms which I find troubling as it is equating supporting Palestine to antisemitism. I think this overlap is true for some groups, but not all. As it often happens in these type of situations, there are groups of peaceful demonstrators willing to discuss issues and negotiate, as well as violent groups always looking for a reason to justify violent acts. This article puts all of them together in the same boat.

This is obviously trying to demean President Biden for a relatively unimportant event in order to garner dissatisfaction at the current office.

This article is troubling because it perpetuates theories about President Biden's health. Obviously it is not unlikely for an individual of 81 years to have health problems, however these theories being pushed seem to be an effort to undermine his reelection goals and question his current leadership abilities. The worst part of an article such as this one is that further research from other articles provides more context about the positioning of the chairs and that this short clip is negligible in the larger situation.

For an article claiming to weep over the death of reporting with integrity, this article certainly poisons the well, simply repeating many tired conservative talking points about supposed "Liberal Media Bias". If you want to chastise someone, calling them "a satanic organization that employs a bunch of otherwise unskilled dopes", is, in my opinion, unnecessarily severe. And perhaps you shouldn't tip your hand so much when it comes to your bias, and term Trump's critics "retarded" individuals who only "admonish their (journalist peers) for failing to properly muzzle anyone who doesn't vote Democrat." Certainly the media landscape can be toxic, but poisoning the well like this doesn't help.

Article title makes it seem as though the bulk of it would be about concerns about Trump leading up to the 2024 presidential campaign, however, it is also about other countries concerns about another term with Biden in regards to his aging issue.

While there is no misinformation per se in this article, this article has an extreme liberal bias. This article talks about how the republicans are trying to undermine Biden's education policy.

This article's use of the term "super-spreader" seems to be praying on people's fears during peak Covid times. The article goes on to speak about the dengue virus and the two cases that have been identified in France, in no way does this suggest it would be a super spreader event. The article mentions a similar fear with the Brazil Olympics where people were worried about the spread of Zika, in which there was no real spread. This whole article seems like fear-mongering.