Previous Troubling Reports

The title of the article implies that the call with JD Vance and Susie Wiles will be a significant talking point (and played a significant and evidence-based role in Musk's actions) in the article, but within the article itself only a few throw-away lines are devoted to the event. After those lines, the article goes on to give the play-by-play of Musk's actions before and after his retraction, rehashing many of the events of the conflict between President Trump and Elon Musk. The article uses extremely biased language like "breakup" and "dutifully tucked his tail between his legs," making it seem like this article is meant to be more of a dramatic and emotion-provoking retelling while not actually talking about the details from the headline.

Everything they claim has gone down in price is simply not true. Used car prices are rising, just like they did during the COVID era. Gas has gone up, and our weekly grocery bill continues to creep higher. Mortgage rates have also increased. Nothing has dropped as expected. The current state of things is outrageous. Even basic items like deodorant at Target are nearly three times the price compared to places like England. The cost of living...never mind luxury goods, which we don't even need, is ridiculous.

Despite video evidence that Senator Alex Padilla was wearing his Senate polo (and had to be screened for legitimacy before entering the building), Noem is spinning the story to frame him as an attacker. This is another example of a lie by the current administration to keep up their facade that they are keeping the American people "safe".

Well, the headline speaks for itself. There is no inflation… except there is a little bit. The first line of the article contradicts itself yet again: "U.S consumer prices barely rose at all in May, the fourth straight month of mild inflation.” The article explains that inflation did, in fact, increase by .1%. While this was lower than other leftist sources projected it to be, it is still inflation. The article goes on to say that Trump’s presidency has been marked by “low inflation,” notably, not no inflation. I expected this journalist to justify the headline by noting that the inflation is from Biden’s America (not Trump’s)… but they did not even take that route (and it was right there). Breitbart, call me. I think these contradictions paired with the headline (not to mention, the title itself) is blatantly misinformative.

This article is very close to being informative, but the amount of loaded language makes it unreliable. Even from the first sentence "Los Angeles rioters, who are ravaging the streets in protest of deporting illegal migrants, forced three Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) facilities in the LA area to shut down due to safety concerns, delaying nearly 300 legal migrants from receiving their hard-fought American citizenship" the biases are clear. While there are some rioters in LA, there are also peaceful protesters. Labeling them all the same only serves to villainize the entire group. Saying they are "ravaging the streets" is unnecessary and contributes to the negative image the author is trying to push.

This article is slightly troublesome as it seems to vaguely support a journalist's claim the protests are being "mischaracterized" without much substance or examples of mischaracterization. It just has one sentence where it vaguely mentions stuff like old posts and AI, which may be true, but the whole article comes off as downplaying the protests.

The title is misleading. Around 90% of the article isn’t about the riots in L.A. or the deployment of the National Guard there. Instead, it primarily focuses on Trump’s military parade and how it may be perceived globally. While it’s fair to note that such parades are often associated with dictatorships and are undeniably expensive, the headline suggests that Trump is exercising unchecked power in response to the L.A. riots—which isn’t accurate. In reality, he has observed the situation while California and Los Angeles County continue to struggle with separating peaceful protesters from looters and agitators. We only need to recall how the Black Lives Matter protests escalated like wildfire...something California’s leadership failed to contain. In conclusion, Trump is not using unrestrained power in this context, and the article’s main focus is on the optics of a military parade, not the unrest in L.A. The title is misleading.

This article uses biased language to describe many other news sources, like CNN and BBC, and only captures the pro-Israel view. It also falsely posits that there is no aid distribution problem in Gaza, which we know there is.

This article only provides comments made about a California Democratic lawmaker, citing influencers on social media. It does not go further into the story to really address the actions that led to her make these comments, and only pushes one side of the story, which is harmful and polarizing.

This article includes multiple ad hominem attacks against Norma Torres from unverified sources, questioning her sanity and political affiliation while also promoting calls for removing her from office and arresting her. This sort of extrapolation from a single tweet helps incite further violence and political division.

The article assumes that the Biden administration pushed the FBI to pursue an anti-Catholic agenda due to an alleged memo that gave the agency a green light to pursue innocent Americans based on their faith; however, there is no evidence of a memo, and the whistleblower making the accusation is unnamed. Furthermore, the article lacks sources, and although it claims that this is hard evidence, it proceeds to manipulate its quotations within the body of the article to reinforce the author's opinion.

The article reports that House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries supports identifying ICE agents, many of whom wear masks to conceal their identities. It then claims that Democrats want to hand over ICE agents to cartels, which greatly exaggerates the original statement.