Previous Troubling Reports

As far as I can tell from the article, the candidate never actually said that MAGA supporters should go to "re-education camps." Instead, she merely said there needs to be a widespread push for civics education. Later in the article, someone is quoted as saying a tape found her actually saying MAGA supporters need to be "re-educated" bur there is no link or evidence to back it up.

To my understanding, the claims in this article are not backed up by sources. Therefore, even though this is obviously an opinion piece and is biased by default, the central assertion that the Washington Post is losing subscribers because "it's become almost impossible to distinguish the Washington Post from the Democratic National Committee" is baseless.

The author Neil Munro, in his closing statement, claims that "Biden’s business allies want more consumers, more renters, and wage-cutting workers, and his Democratic Party base wants more welfare clients and dependent voters". This statement is biased with inflammatory language like welfare clients, and wage-cutting workers. The statement is backed by little evidence, providing no real proof that those outcomes are the expressed desire of democratic voters and donors.

This article blatantly slanders the very concept of Pride Month by its strong use of language. One example is their referring to it as one of the 'seven deadly sins'. They attempt to ger people riled up at the concept of pride month, and try to get people to move against it.

Overall, there is a lot of extreme language used, indicating a bias. Additionally, there is a clear and obvious voice of negativity towards pride month and homosexuality in general. It mostly takes a religious standpoint and as a result, the report is presented in a very biased way. It takes very strong viewpoints, saying things like "it should" or "shouldn't" or referring to this as a "deadly sin". Thus, this is a clear example of troubling and biased news.

Overall, there is a lot of extreme language used, indicating a bias. Additionally, there is a clear and obvious voice of negativity towards pride month and homosexuality in general. It mostly takes a religious standpoint and as a result, the report is presented in a very biased way. It takes very strong viewpoints, saying things like "it should" or "shouldn't" or referring to this as a "deadly sin". Thus, this is a clear example of troubling and biased news.

This article is troubling to me due to the misgendering of the athlete and blatant transphobia. It refers to a trans woman as "him," and implies that she won a race due to not being a biological female. It frames her as the villain of the story for standing up to transphobia and it is unacceptable.

This article is troubling from its very first paragraph. It labels homosexuality as "one of the seven deadly sins," arguing we should not have a month (i.e., Pride Month) for such. This is incredibly concerning as it is filled with religious propaganda, forcing their own views onto others.

The article headline uses the word withhold, when in reality the Universities, like University of Chicago is refuses four students diplomas. While the difference is not as bad, I think it should separate the case of University of Chicago as it is actively refusing to grant four students diplomas as of recently.

Promotes inappropriate usage of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and assertions of reverse discrimination that will be used in news publications in order to justify biased viewpoints.

Title compares the NYPD with the IDF, and the KKK, which risks radicalizing the argument against policing while deterring potential centrist supporters. Rest of the article remains generally factual in spite of this.

Deliberately connects a pro-Palestinian event with the terrorist organization Hamas while linking to other articles that boost its agenda while demonizing any opposition.