Previous Troubling Reports

Overall, there is a lot of extreme language used, indicating a bias. Additionally, there is a clear and obvious voice of negativity towards pride month and homosexuality in general. It mostly takes a religious standpoint and as a result, the report is presented in a very biased way. It takes very strong viewpoints, saying things like "it should" or "shouldn't" or referring to this as a "deadly sin". Thus, this is a clear example of troubling and biased news.

This article is troubling to me due to the misgendering of the athlete and blatant transphobia. It refers to a trans woman as "him," and implies that she won a race due to not being a biological female. It frames her as the villain of the story for standing up to transphobia and it is unacceptable.

This article is troubling from its very first paragraph. It labels homosexuality as "one of the seven deadly sins," arguing we should not have a month (i.e., Pride Month) for such. This is incredibly concerning as it is filled with religious propaganda, forcing their own views onto others.

The article headline uses the word withhold, when in reality the Universities, like University of Chicago is refuses four students diplomas. While the difference is not as bad, I think it should separate the case of University of Chicago as it is actively refusing to grant four students diplomas as of recently.

Promotes inappropriate usage of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and assertions of reverse discrimination that will be used in news publications in order to justify biased viewpoints.

Title compares the NYPD with the IDF, and the KKK, which risks radicalizing the argument against policing while deterring potential centrist supporters. Rest of the article remains generally factual in spite of this.

Deliberately connects a pro-Palestinian event with the terrorist organization Hamas while linking to other articles that boost its agenda while demonizing any opposition.

Continuing to push narrative of rigged justice system that in the long term will undermine institutions that are key to a stable democracy.

Couched in hostile language to create a narrative that contrasts the reality of the situation by making the Biden administration seem to be entertaining the appeasement of a designated terrorist organization.

This article does not exactly spread fake news, however, it is extremely biased towards the right side. There are multiple phrases in the article that is blatently against the democrat president Joe Biden. While this article is not particulary leaning toward republicans, it is extremely biased against the democrats.

There isn't anything inherently "False" or "fake" about this news, however, the way that it was worded throughout is what really stuck with me. The article points at Biden spending billions of dollars towards what the journalist calls "community organizations in disadvantaged communities". At face value, the article is slamming Biden for distributing money back into communities who need more financial support, and calls it "buying votes". Again, while there's nothing directly wrong or false with what the article is saying, it is certainly being written is a heavily biased manner that was pretty eye catching

Article quotes a couple of angry comments on X (Twitter) over LGBTQ pride posts. It actually does very little reporting or informing, as it is the equivalent of a quick scrolling through X. That fact aside, I find it problematic that it only shows one side of the reactions, making it seem as if all reactions and comments were negative.