Previous Troubling Reports

This article is troubling for me because of its language. Despite Bolsonaro having already been indicted, the author refuses to acknowledge the reality of the issue. This is noticeable in the title, in which it is emphasized how the falsification is "alleged." In the article, the author also mentions protests in favor of Bolsonaro, claiming he is being wrongly persecuted. This is similar to the U.S. narrative of Donald Trump facing a "witch hunt." Both former presidents are extreme right-wing populists, which fits the narrative as to why Fox News, a news source with conservative bias, would be portraying this in a positive light for him.

I think that this article is sharing an opinion without showing the other side of the general publics thoughts. Although most democrats cannot feel confident in electing an 86 year old into office, this does not mean that they want Trump to be in office. Fox News deliberately only shares their preferred side of the story, furthering the republican agenda.

The discussion regarding these developments is framed as advanced and ready to use when in reality the technology is still in the discovery phase. They are discussing potential, not reality. It is easy to get caught up in the headline and think that it is something that will be implemented. In other words, the headline misrepresents what is actually taking place.

The bias against Biden is evident in the title itself. The article also focuses entirely on the U.S.'s economic problems and Biden's role in creating these issues; there is no commentary that defends Biden or explains his side of the issue.

The bias against Biden is evident in the title itself. The article also focuses entirely on the U.S.'s economic problems and Biden's role in creating these issues; there is no commentary that defends Biden or explains his side of the issue.

Article focuses more on authors negative perception of Trump and his character. It does cite some sayings and statements, however it does not focus as much on Trump's constant backtracking on the abortion issue which is more pertinent to the 2024 scene.

This article is concerning to me due to the clear bias present. Apart from not using sources that highlight different viewpoints, the author is straightforwardly name-calling the opposition. At one point in the text, the author refers to the contenders as "clowns." Not only is this entirely unprofessional, it also creates a polarizing narrative and further accentuates polarization in American society.

The conservative bias is very apparent from the title alone. The author falsely characterizes President Joe Biden's student loan debt relief as buying votes for the upcoming election. It would suggest that Biden relief their student loans in exchange for their votes despite no evidence. The type of headline is designed to generate outrage for Hannity's conservative audience.

I think the title is making it seem as if Harvard and a lot of other colleges never required test scores to begin with. I think that articles covering the topic of colleges returning to their pre covid admissions requirements are looking for a negative response for those who thought that not submitting test scores made admissions easier. In reality, although test scores were not required, test scores have been important throughout covid and until recently, and make an application stronger when test scores have been submitted.

I think the title is making it seem as if Harvard and a lot of other colleges never required test scores to begin with. I think that articles covering the topic of colleges returning to their pre covid admissions requirements are looking for a negative response for those who thought that not submitting test scores made admissions easier. In reality, although test scores were not required, test scores have been important throughout covid and until recently, and make an application stronger when test scores have been submitted.

The headline is misleading and ambiguous as to why Trump is being charged. As a reader, the headline seems disconnected and confusing from the content of the article, left unaware of what he is actually being charged for.

The headline is misleading and ambiguous as to why Trump is being charged. As a reader, the headline seems disconnected and confusing from the content of the article, left unaware of what he is actually being charged for.