Previous Troubling Reports

I dislike the structure of this article, framing the news in a divisive manner for such a small occurance. The one-worded quotes, again, are unprofessional,

The article is entirely composed of statements that Trump himself made, which are completely opinionated and have no factual backing.

While reading this article, it is clear that the author is against Biden and the Democratic Party. It continuously accuses them of stealing the 2020 election from Trump. It further goes on to discuss how the Democrats will steal the election in 2024 as well. It accuses, without providing evidence to back up the claims, that cities like Atlanta, Milwaukee, and Detroit helped to ensure Trump's defeat in the swing states. The article further goes into a huge conspiracy about COVID, Mark Zuckerberg, and various other organizations and individuals helping the Biden campaign. This article is provides no factual information to back up their claims. It repeatedly makes assertions that they are unable to back up. It is a story that was clearly written to slander Biden and the Democratic Party. The author wants Republicans to believe that the election was stolen from them.

While reading the article, I noticed that there was a lot of quotations and favor of Biden’s stance. It is good to note that there were quotes describing the event on both sides how President Biden, and the Prime Minister of Israel felt about the plans to come. However there were more quotes that were against the plan by Israel’s Prime Minister can be a sign of biased that the author is showing in terms of how they feel about the situation.

This article exhibits a clear Republican bias, as it focuses heavily on the suspect's immigration status to support the argument that immigrants are inherently prone to criminal behavior. Rather than providing a balanced view of the case, the article emphasizes the suspect's illegal immigration status. This emphasis on immigration status serves to perpetuate stereotypes and fears about immigrants, aligning with the Republican narrative that stricter immigration policies are necessary for public safety. By framing the narrative in this way, the article reinforces the Republican agenda of prioritizing immigration enforcement over other factors contributing to crime. Overall, the article's Republican bias is evident in its selective reporting and framing of the narrative to support a particular political perspective.

This article exhibits a clear Republican bias, as it focuses heavily on the suspect's immigration status to support the argument that immigrants are inherently prone to criminal behavior. Rather than providing a balanced view of the case, the article emphasizes the suspect's illegal immigration status. This emphasis on immigration status serves to perpetuate stereotypes and fears about immigrants, aligning with the Republican narrative that stricter immigration policies are necessary for public safety. By framing the narrative in this way, the article reinforces the Republican agenda of prioritizing immigration enforcement over other factors contributing to crime. Overall, the article's Republican bias is evident in its selective reporting and framing of the narrative to support a particular political perspective.

The article numbers some basic facts related to Haiti, however it fails to mention the role that France and the US played in Haiti's history. It is not information that can be overlooked, as Haiti had to pay "reparations" to France for they freedom which is absolutely ridiculous, while the US occupied Haiti by force during 19 years. Both pieces of information are crucial to understand why Haiti has never been able to surge as a stable country. I mean, the country did not become the poorest in America just because, and violent and abusive interventions of major world powers over developing countries should never be overlooked.

The title is very bait-y. The one-worded quotations seem quite mocking. The writer is not focused on delivering news, but rather focused on delivering entertainment or creating divide.

Instead of focusing on how our former president failed to address the concern of COVID in a timely manner and lockdown our country, the article instead talks about social media and violence. I think that Fox News oftentimes fails to connect their article title to the actual content of the article. Instead of addressing the lack of mental health funding, the article and video instead blame social media on the rise of violence in children.

Instead of focusing on how our former president failed to address the concern of COVID in a timely manner and lockdown our country, the article instead talks about social media and violence. I think that Fox News oftentimes fails to connect their article title to the actual content of the article. Instead of addressing the lack of mental health funding, the article and video instead blame social media on the rise of violence in children.

This article is troubling because it does not provide a comprehensive explanation of a policy created by The Judicial Conference of the United States that is meant to restore the random assignment of court cases. The explanation that is provided contains left-leaning bias and frames Republicans in a negative light. For example, it is written: "Worse, a handful of Republican-appointed judges have made a habit of issuing sweeping decisions that apply nationwide—hobbling the federal government, short-circuiting the democratic process, and transferring inconceivable amounts of power into the hands of a few unelected jurists." The diction and tone are meant to inspire an emotional reaction among the readers, and there is a general lack of right-leaning perspectives in this piece. The information is also portrayed as fact, even though much of it is opinion.

There are many reasons this particular article is troubling. The most concerning issue is that it only addresses the topic of abortion from a left-leaning perspective. Conservative views are almost entirely missing from this report. The diction used is also inflammatory, as it attempts to villainize Republican values and condemns many of their objectives. For example, the article concludes with: "The former president, she said, was “proud that women across our nation are suffering, proud that doctors and nurses could be thrown in prison for administering care.” The author portrays Harris in a positive, heroic light, while negatively framing Trump. This paints an unrealistic and one-sided outline of the discussion.