Previous Troubling Reports

This is slightly misleading as it portrays the "left" as picking and choosing what news about gun violence to use to fit their narrative, and does not use any contrary viewpoints that explains some stances on gun control.

This is slightly misleading as it portrays the "left" as picking and choosing what news about gun violence to use to fit their narrative, and does not use any contrary viewpoints that explains some stances on gun control.

This article is troubling to me because It doesn’t give equal weight to other potential interpretations of Newsom’s statement (empathy vs. critique of policy), presenting a one-sided narrative.

The article appears in the claim that Trump “seemingly made progress in moving toward an agreement between Moscow and Kiev” during a summit in Alaska. This statement is misleading because, as of late August 2025, no credible reports confirm that Trump, or any U.S. president, successfully negotiated a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine. The article presents this claim as though it were a verified development, when in reality it is based solely on Trump’s own statements. This reporting risks giving readers a false impression that a breakthrough in the conflict has occurred, making this an example of misinformation.

While the article itself is not spreading misinformation, it is talking about a false claim that this MAGA influencer made. However, I wanted to point out that just reading the title, I wouldn't have known if they were supporting or denying her claim.

This article uses language that suggests Schumer acted inappropriately by saying he “pushed” gun control in response to the shooting. This article is focused on criticizing Schumer’s response, which seems unnecessary, rather than actually addressing the tragedy that occurred.

This article attempts to conflate Mamdani's ability to preform as NYC mayor with his bench press ability, featuring multiple quotes from conservatives calling Mamdani weak. The article also only features conservative viewpoints and relies heavily on social media sources.

While Fox News is presenting direct statements from involved politicians, it continues pushing the agenda that the Epstein Files are a "Democratic hoax," claiming Democrats are in "psychosis" for demanding the files to be released. A direct quote from President Donald Trump clearly states that the Democratic hoax of the Epstein Files is detracting from his "greatest six months" in office.

This article is misleading as it fails to adequately give sources to its claims. For example, it listed only "according to sources" for one claim and ignores opposing viewpoints.

This article is spreading misinformation because the title is misleading. The Trump Administration did not order the removal of the rainbow crosswalk. What happened was that the Trump Administration released the Safe Roads Initiative, which urged governors to eliminate distractions on non-freeway roads. The removal of the road was done by Governor Ron DeSantis since he believed this would be following the initiative. Whether this was the intended result of the Trump Administration, the article does not prove.

This articles headline presents a definitive statement from a political figure, but excludes crucial context that would be included in the full article. The headline assumes that the reader knows who Lisa Cook is and why she is a "fed governor", a better title choice could include her full title or brief description. The headline also does not explain as to why President Trump would want her to resign or why exactly he would fire her. In addition to the title, there is some bias language throughout the article. The word "fire" is a strong confrontational word paired with the phrase "if she doesn't resign," frames the situation as a direct threat towards her. This framing could appeal to the audience that is strongly in favor of or strongly against this person making the statement, reinforcing existing opinions.

This articles headline presents a definitive statement from a political figure, but excludes crucial context that would be included in the full article. The headline assumes that the reader knows who Lisa Cook is and why she is a "fed governor", a better title choice could include her full title or brief description. The headline also does not explain as to why President Trump would want her to resign or why exactly he would fire her. In addition to the title, there is some bias language throughout the article. The word "fire" is a strong confrontational word paired with the phrase "if she doesn't resign," frames the situation as a direct threat towards her. This framing could appeal to the audience that is strongly in favor of or strongly against this person making the statement, reinforcing existing opinions.