Prosecutors defend Trump's New York criminal conviction after Supreme Court immunity ruling

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

52% : As part of that decision, which was made in Trump's federal election interference case, five Republican-appointed justices ruled that evidence of presidential actions that are immune from prosecution can't even be used in evidence when prosecuting non-official actions.
31% : A 12-person jury unanimously convicted Trump of falsifying 34 business records in order to cover up a 2016 election-interference conspiracy involving hush money to porn star Stormy Daniels.
25% : Trump says that various pieces of evidence constituted immune official conduct, including testimony by former Trump aide Hope Hicks that a conversation with Trump during his presidency led her to believe he preferred having news of the hush money payment break in 2018 rather than before the 2016 election.
24% : Trump is arguing that evidence introduced in his New York criminal trial and earlier, before the grand jury that indicted him, ran afoul of the newly-announced rule.
10% : Trump wants both the guilty verdict and the indictment tossed out after the Supreme Court's conservative majority granted Trump and future indicted presidents significant criminal immunity on July 1.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.