Bloomberg News Article RatingSackett Court's New Wetlands Test Leaves Open Questions
- Bias Rating
-6% Center
- Reliability
40% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
26% Somewhat Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
40% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
49% : The case is Sackett v. EPA, U.S., 21-454, 5/25/2348% : The legal issue before the court was what kinds of wetlands are properly subject to federal regulation under the Clean Water Act.
48% : The court seemed broadly skeptical of a need for federal regulation of "mundane activities like moving dirt" even though, arguably, that is the primary activity regulated by the wetlands program.
41% : The majority opinion seemed to acknowledge the concurrence in a footnote, observing that a landowner could not evade regulation by illegally constructing an artificial barrier in a wetland to destroy adjacency.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.