Scotiabank reports first quarter results
- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
45% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
52% : Support costs for the Scene+ loyalty program: The Bank recorded costs of $98 million ($133 million pre-tax) to support the expansion of the Scene+ loyalty program to include Empire Company Limited as a partner.50% : Adjusted results and measures remove certain specified items from revenue, non-interest expenses, income taxes and non-controlling interest.
46% : Q1 2023 vs Q4 2022Net income attributable to equity holders decreased by $1 million to $654 million as higher non-interest income and net interest income were offset by higher provision for income taxes, non-interest expenses and provision for credit losses.
46% : On an adjusted basis, net income attributable to equity holders decreased $234 million, due mainly to lower revenues of $417 million, partly offset by lower expenses and income taxes.
45% : This increase was driven by higher non-interest income and net interest income, partly offset by higher non-interest expenses, provision for income taxes, and provision for credit losses.
45% : This increase was driven by higher net interest income and non-interest income, and lower provision for income taxes, partly offset by higher provision for credit losses and non-interest expenses.
44% : The increase was driven by higher net interest income and non-interest income and lower provision for income taxes, partly offset by higher non-interest expenses and provision for credit losses.
44% : The decrease of $267 million was due mainly to lower revenues of $663 million, partly offset by lower expenses and income taxes.
40% : Collectively, the sale and wind-down of these entities resulted in a net loss of $340 million ($361 million pre-tax), of which $294 million ($315 million pre-tax) related to the reclassification of cumulative foreign currency translation losses net of hedges, from accumulated other comprehensive income to non-interest income in the Consolidated Statement of Income.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.