SCOTUS Rules Border Agents Can Cut Texas Border Barriers - and They're Wrong
- Bias Rating
38% Somewhat Conservative
- Reliability
90% ReliableExcellent
- Policy Leaning
30% Somewhat Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-64% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-9% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
55% : We will watch to see what the state government and Governor Abbott do.42% : In 1869, when Texas entered the union, the state constitution included a Bureau of Immigration, and it was not until an errant Supreme Court ruling in a case called "Chy Lung v Freeman" that a group of corrupt "justices" made-up a federal "power" over immigration.
29% : At the most basic level, the case is tragic and pits state interests against Biden policy-in-practice.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.