Sen. Sullivan trip to visit Taiwan president, as seen through the eyes of a Wall Street Journal reporter
- Bias Rating
-2% Center
- Reliability
40% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
N/A
- Politician Portrayal
14% Positive
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
7% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
56% : "Caught in the middle of these political and geopolitical currents is Sullivan, a leading voice in his party on national security who has sought to maintain the GOP's traditional Reaganite posture in the face of his party's rising isolationism," the reporter observed.55% : "He was referring to a People's Republic law passed in 2005 that says China may use "non-peaceful means" if anyone causes Taiwan's secession or if "prospects for peaceful unification [are] completely exhausted."
28% : She then side-eyed Sullivan over his statement condemning the conviction of Donald Trump on all 34 felony counts against him last week, which he called "a sad day for America ... that sets a dangerous precedent and pushes our great nation even further into banana republic territory.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.