Smith, in a Fiery Filing, Accuses Judge Cannon of Being 'Wrong' on Trump's Trial and Threatens Her With Extraordinary Appeal
- Bias Rating
58% Medium Conservative
- Reliability
50% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
-10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-28% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
6% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
63% : The Department of Justice, which employs Mr. Smith, writes in its own resource manual that "Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy, which should only be used in exceptional circumstances of peculiar emergency or public importance."53% : Mr. Smith's cri de coeur takes the form of a reply to Judge Cannon's order that both he and President Trump furnish her with jury instructions in respect of the relevance of a Watergate-era statute, the Presidential Records Act.
45% : Mr. Smith maintains that the only relevant law is the Espionage Act and the various obstruction charges he has handed up.
43% : Jury instructions are the latest flashpoint between Special Counsel Jack Smith's and Judge Aileen Cannon over her stewardship of the trial of President Trump, a conflict that brings into sharp relief how the relationship between prosecutor and jurist could soon be altered by an appeal.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.