Some providers are dropping gender-affirming care for kids even in cases where it's legal

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

54% : Hormuth, a teacher, has asked also her principal to write a recommendation in case the family decides to move to another state.
52% : Apple Podcasts | Google Podcasts | Spotify | RSS Feed | Omny StudioIn North Dakota, the law allows treatment to continue for minors who were receiving care before the law took effect in April.
51% : "No one should have to have a plan to move out of state just because their kid needs to get the health care they need.
44% : Its decision followed a similar one from University of Missouri Health Care, where the treatment for minors stopped Aug. 28, the same day the law took effect.
44% : The law gives the health care provider the burden of proving that the harm was not the result of hormones or puberty-blocking drugs.
40% : Both blamed a section of the law that increased the liability for providers.
31% : They say the health care is harmful.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.