Supreme Court Denies Florida's Request To Reinstate Its Anti-Drag Law
- Bias Rating
-88% Very Liberal
- Reliability
25% ReliablePoor
- Policy Leaning
-94% Very Liberal
- Politician Portrayal
-24% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
45% : On Thursday, the Supreme Court also refused to reinstate the law with a vote of 6-3, NPR reported.44% : After the motion was denied by a divided 11th Circuit panel, the state turned to the U.S. Supreme Court to request that the law be reinstated.
39% : "In June, a federal judge sided with Hamburger Mary's and issued a preliminary order blocking the law from taking full effect.
36% : According to The Washington Post, the restaurant's attorney Donald A. Donati urged the Supreme Court not to allow the law to take effect, pointing out that Florida already has laws that prevent children from viewing sexually explicit material.
34% : Donati added that Hamburger Mary's drag shows are "not harmful to minors" but that restaurant owners are worried about being prosecuted for violating the law because of its broad and vague language.
33% : In a lawsuit against the state and DeSantis, the business argued that the law was a violation of free speech and that its phrasing was "vague and indistinct.
28% : In a statement explaining the decision, Justice Brett Kavanaugh and Justice Amy Coney Barrett said that the decision does not reflect their own views on whether the law violates the First Amendment but that the state didn't raise the issue in its filings to the court.
25% : The three dissenting justices, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch, indicated that they would have allowed the law to take effect.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.