WEISSupreme Court reviews federal ban on guns for domestic abusers - WEIS | Local & Area News, Sports, & Weather
- Bias Rating
-10% Center
- Reliability
35% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
-10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
30% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
58% : The justices are taking up the issue one year after a landmark decision made it more difficult for governments to restrict individual gun rights.40% : He argues in court documents the law is not supported by American history and tradition.
35% : "The Biden administration, which is defending the law, insists the nation has a broad history and tradition of disarming people who are not "responsible, law-abiding citizens" -- even if there is no exact historical replica of a law targeting domestic abusers.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.