Supreme Court takes challenge to Jan. 6 charge that could have implications for Trump

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

54% : Nichols ruled that a defendant must have taken "some action with respect to a document, record or other object" to obstruct an official proceeding under the law.
41% : WHY JACK SMITH APPEALED DIRECTLY TO SCOTUS, WITH TRUMP TRYING TO DELAY CASE PAST THE ELECTIONU.S. District Judge Carl Nichols found that prosecutors stretched the law beyond its scope to inappropriately apply it in these cases.
32% : Biden's DOJ challenged that ruling, and the appeals court in Washington, D.C. agreed with prosecutors in April that Nichols' interpretation of the law was too limited.SUPREME COURT:

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.