Supreme Court: Web designer can refuse same-sex wedding sites under...

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

48% : While anti-discrimination laws "play a vital role in realizing civil rights of all Americans," in this case forcing Smith would set a precedent allowing "government to force all manner of artists, speechwriters, and others whose services involve speech to speak what they do not believe on pain of penalty," Gorsuch wrote.
47% : The 303 Creative case expanded on another landmark Supreme Court decision out of Colorado, the 2018 ruling in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, in which the court ruled that baker Jack Phillips could refuse to make a wedding cake for a same-sex couple on religious objection grounds.
46% : "Petitioners remain free to advocate the idea that same-sex marriage betrays God's laws," Sotomayor went on.
37% : The Supreme Court ruled Friday that an evangelical Christian web designer could not be forced to work on wedding sites celebrating same-sex couples because it would violate her First Amendment right against compelled speech.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.