The attempt to bar Trump under the 14th Amendment, explained

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

50% : Officials whose duties include the conduct of elections -- the secretary of state, usually -- could simply strike him from the ballot.
46% : "So far, state secretaries of state have shown no enthusiasm for the idea, presumably because it would put them at the center of a national constitutional maelstrom.
32% : An article in The Atlantic that was supportive of the legal case for barring Trump nonetheless quoted a Stanford law professor, Michael McConnell, who worried that "we are talking about empowering partisan politicians such as state Secretaries of State to disqualify their political opponents from the ballot ...
24% : "In layperson's terms, this argument holds that the bar can take effect regardless of Trump's lack of criminal conviction and without the need for a judge's ruling.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.