New York Post Article RatingThe Secret Service's serious failure: Letters to the Editor -- July...
- Bias Rating
32% Medium Conservative
- Reliability
25% ReliablePoor
- Policy Leaning
74% Very Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-60% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-24% Negative
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
47% : It seems they surrounded him with all agents being 6 feet or less, while Trump is 6 feet 4 inches.45% : How could they have utterly failed to cover every single building within shooting distance of Trump?Many years ago, I was visiting Jerusalem and staying at the King David Hotel.
34% : Florida Rep. Mike Waltz has accused the Secret Service of refusing to provide requested additional protection for Trump.
29% : Why did they fire on the assailant only after he had shot Trump and others at the rally, despite being advised minutes previously by bystanders that a man with a rifle was crawling across a rooftop overlooking the venue?
27% : The Secret Service did a poor job of getting Trump into the emergency vehicle.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.