The Supreme Court That Transforms Right-Wing Grievances Into Law

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

61% : It's something that conservatives on the internet complain about a lot, so neither the explicit text of the First Amendment nor the Court's prior jurisprudence on corporate speech matter.
41% : In his concurrence, Justice Clarence Thomas writes that precedents establishing access to contraception, legalizing same-sex marriage, and striking down anti-sodomy laws should be "reconsidered."
34% : In this case, Alito declares that "nothing in this opinion should be understood to cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abortion," even as he argues that when it comes to rights "not mentioned in the Constitution," only those "deeply rooted in this Nation's history and tradition" are protected.
32% : Being anti-abortion became an essential aspect of conservative politics over the course of decades; the level of ideological unanimity and discipline on abortion in today's GOP has not always existed.
28% : Clearly Alito does not believe laws against abortion to be similarly pointless even though abortions will continue regardless.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.